Skip to content

James G. Schmier: A Michigan Law License Mistake

Loser SchmierWhile representing Case No. GC 09 1653 in the Michigan 46th District Court, he James G. Schmier (P70825) did nothing. He didn’t know what he was doing but didn’t know what to do. He worked for the defense attorneys Jeanne Barron and Jeffrey Vollmer NOT plaintiff his client. He allowed an attached counter claim that should have been prevented. A counter claim must attach to the original lawsuit immediately after filing. He, Schmier filed a lawsuit for plaintiff and ex-client 04/2009 in the Michigan 46th District Court. A counter claim attached to it September 2009, months late. This refutes his advertising. He is not an experienced lawyer “will fight for you”. He, additionally could not account for funds used/unused. After nine months of doing absolutely nothing, he petitioned the court to withdraw and did. He did not respond to motion and did not appear for hearing; this is notated on transcript. He confessed this to the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission but the transcript proved his guilt.

He confessed inept but put on top of it a really big lie. He said he entered the wrong date into his computer. “I admit I failed to attend meeting. . . . I made a mistake in entering it in my computer calendar. The hearing was 09/30/2009. I mistakenly entered in my computer calendar for 10/30/2009”. Hummmmm Really!!! He did this too, he presented the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission a bogus retainer fee agreement. He did. Yes he did. According to Schmier, he sent (2) copies of the retainer fee to client via US Mail but neither was returned to him. Laugh. Go ahead and laugh. Laugh, laugh, laugh.

Hummmm stupid, pure stupidity. The client NEVER received either of the two retainer fee agreements because he (Schmier) NEVER prepared/submitted them. He LIED. The subject matter concerning a retainer fee agreement between Schmier and client NEVER ever surfaced. After nine months of doing nothing, he (Schmier) said “this case is hard. He said that this case is hard but also exposed his NEGLECT and Civil Conspiracy. Client accompanied by a Birmingham, Michigan police officer retrieved all case files from Schmier at his Birmingham, MI office (2222 Attard St.) December 2009. This was before the January 2010 court date to hear argument to release him as counsel.

He (Schmier) NEVER had conversations with the Birmingham, MI police officer concerning escorted client. He said he did. He LIED. The Birmingham, MI police officer denies his allegation. “I did not tell him that and I did not write that in my police report. I was leaving right behind you [ex-client]. He, therefore, has compromised and damaged a Birmingham, Michigan police officer’s reputation and ex-client. He went that far for Attorney Jeanne V. Barron, Raftery, Janeczek & Hoelscher/Farmington Hills, MI (white female woman lawyer looks like a man). He went that far for Attorney Jeffrey L. Vollmer (Wegner & Associates, P.C/Saint Clair Shores, MI). They surrendered him something and or promised him something (Jeanne Barron and Jeffrey Vollmer, something he wanted it – real bad. Evidence of the habit of a person or of the routine practice of an organization, whether corroborated or not and regardless of the presence of eyewitness is relevant to prove that the conduct of the person or organization on a particular occassion was in conformity with the habitor routine practice (Reading from the Michigan Rules of evidence 404). He, attorney James G. Schmier made habit of stating inaccurate information.

He (Schmier) is a No. 1 Loser and Master Liar. He lies all over the map. How he ever attained a Michigan Law License is yet a mystery. He, no doubt embarasses the Michigan State Bar. Oh! By the way, he didn’t show up in court to represent himself (01/11/2010). He petitioned the court to withdraw (Case No. GC 09 1653) but did not/could not show his face in court. He wasn’t feeling well. Hummmm, Really!!!. Do not invest in this attorney James G. Schmier. Do not invest in his law firm, Schmier Law, PLLC (Birmingham, MI) and or other businesses associated with him: 1). Dui-Detroit (Birmingham, MI) and 2). J. Schmier Productions, Ltd (Birmingham, MI). WARNING!!! RED FLAG!!!!! His advertisements are ALL FALSE, He is not an experienced lawyer. He’s not an expert in criminal law, DUI, Divorce, etc. He is not an expert at anything.

The Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission was/is non-helpful, blogs and complaint boards are. The attorney, James G. Schmier filed a lawsuit in the Oakland County Circuit Court, Case No. 2011-123947-CZ. Those complaint boards hurt his reputation, APPARENTLY. Case was disposed. Alike Jeanne Barron, his hands are not clean. He could not approach the court with unclean hands. His lawsuit complaint approached the court with unclean hands and improper venue. LOL

The lawsuit complaint, Case No. 2011-123947-CZ stated more non-truths than actual truths. Judge William J. Richards in the Michigan 46th District Court released him as counsel (Case No. GC 09 1653) 01/11/2010 NOT 07/20/2010 as stated in the 2011-123947-C complaint. Document signed by Judge William J. Richards on 01/11/2010 proves this. The Michigan 46th District Court Clerk Wanda Frost on 12/22/2009 forwarded to all parties a Notice of Hearing that was scheduled 01/11/2010 and forwarded one to Attorney James Schmier. Judge William J. Richards on 01/11/2010 granted the petition, counsel (James G. Schmier) to withdraw. The complaint, 2011-123947-CZ said also that defendant filed a complaint against him with the State Bar of Michigan. He lied. Defendant filed a complaint against him (Schmier) with the Attorney Grievance Commission (Detroit, MI) NOT the State Bar (Lansing, MI). Proof of this appeares in the lawsuit complaint, 2011-123947-CZ – correspondence signed by Ruthann Stevens who is associated with the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission. LOL Ruthann Stevens, Esq. at the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commissison investigated the complaint against Schmier, not the Michigan State Bar. Ruthann Stevens at the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission in Detroit, MI (Wayne County) made no move to reprimand him but also did not free him of doing wrong. The Attorney Grievance Commission alike lawyers and judges does not play fair ball. Many Michiganders know this – apparently. Ruthann Stevens, Esq at the Michigan Attorney Grievance seemingly has fallen off track somewhere;letter penned by Elizabeth A. Weaver proves this. Correspondence (attached exhibit – Complaint No. 2011-123947-CZ) submitted by Ruthann Stevens does not free him (Schmier) of doing anything wrong; he thinks otherwise and publicized it in his complaint. He (Schmier) apparently has a comprehension problem; this is rather serious for adults, even more serious for adults practicing law. It’s sad that Schmier did not fully comprehend just what Ruthann Stevens stated in that correspondence, but sadder and rather embarrassing that he filed that complaint and attached to it that correspondence penned by Stevens. He filed a formal lawsuit complaint in the Oakland County Circuit court with exhibits, one of them was correspondence from Ruthann Stevens at the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission (Detroit, MI) but the Attorney Grievance Commission is located is in Wayne County [Michigan] NOT Oakland County [Michigan]. Laugh. Go ahead and laugh. Laugh, laugh, laugh. His claim, case no. 2011-123947-CZ was friv0lous and abuses the law system. Also, he approached the court with unclean hands. He, the attorney James G, Schmier initiated a defamation lawsuit but in it defames his defendant, an ex-client. LOL Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or other acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, scheme, plan, or system in doing an act, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident when the same is material, whether such other crimes, wrongs, or acts are contemporaneous with, or prior or subsequent to the conduct at issue in the case (Reading from the Michigan Rules of Evidence 404 (b) (1). Following that leader Jeanne Vallez Barron leads nowhere.

The Thumbtack site adverises this attorney, James G. Schmer “hire James Schmier if you need an agressive criminal defense lawyer who is also experienced in drunk driving and family law. http://www.thumbtack.com/mi/birmingham/criminal-defense-attorney/criminal-drunk-driving-family-law-attorney LOL

!

Damn Mad Lawyers

Fat white woman lawyer looks like a man

There are some good quality lawyers in southeast Michigan. Ezra N. Goldman, Anthony Della Pelle and Jennifer Cordon Thor (professor/Oakland University Law School/Rochester Hills, MI) just to name a few. Jeanne V. Barron (P37138)is not one of them.

Plaintiff, Ms. “X” on 02/12/08 incurred a slip and fall accident on the Shiawassee Condominium Association property (Southfield, MI) at 7:10am. This was one year exactly after the 02/12/07 correspondence submitted by Attorney Ezra N. Goldman and days after the 01/21/08 correspondence submitted by Attorney Jennifer Cordon Thor. Ms. “X” shortly after the 02/12/2008 accident incurred a Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) and filed a complaint in the Michigan 46th District Court, had filed a previous complaint in the Michigan Oakland Courty Circut Court(2005). Another Shiawassee Condominium Association resident, Edna Rogers incurred a slip and fall accident on the property. She also filed a complaint in the Michigan Oakland County Circuit Court (2003-054328-NO) – They are neglegent, grossly neglegent, Shiawassee Condominium Association. The attorney, Gary Bloomberg represented Edna Rogers (Case No. 2003-054328-NO) forced them to pay damages and the attorney, Ezra N. Goldman representing Ms. “X” (Case No. 2005-067809-NZ) also forced them to pay damages. Their mainteance staff, Robert (Bob)Piech and Thomas Blanding are illiterate but also non-licensed. The State of Michigan, does not allow them to repair air conditioning units, heating, etc. but they do.

The Shiawassee Condominium Association (Southfield, MI) and its maintenance staff of two Robert (Bob) Piech and Thomas Blanding were defendants in the previous litigation 2005-067809-NZ (public record information). and sued by same plaintiff. They invented a crime that didn’t exist and abused the law system. The two, believe it or not, Piech and Blanding appear on defendant’s preliminary lay and expert witness list offered by their attorney Jeanne Barron, Case No. GC 09 1653. None of the board members (Shiawassee Condo Association) were listed ONLY Piech and Blanding who are illiterate and non-licensed maintenance workers. Blanding, believe it or not during court proceeding “on witness stand” could not read what he actually wrote. “I can’t. I can’t believe I can’t read my own writing”. That was Blanding’s testimoney “on transctipt”. Here is Piech “Well you know Mr. “X” has made some complaints to the board of directors and you know and and you know”. Both, Blanding and Piech responded to interrogatories (Case No. 2005-067809-NZ assisted by their attorney Jeanne Barron but both were selected witnesses, Case No. GC 09 1653, selected by Attorney Jeanne Barron. Laugh. Go ahead and laugh. The lawsuit, GC 09 1653 additionally was served upon a board member not either of those two non-licensed maintenance thugs, but none of the board members appear on the witness list, only those two non-licensed maintenance thugs employed by the Shiawassee Condominium Association. They, Piech and Blanding have no right to enter into anyone’s condo unit attempting to repair or repair anything – must be licensed by the State of Michigan. Providence Hospital (Livonia, MI) appears on defendant’s preliminary lay and expert witness list. Plaintiff, Ms. “X” was hospitalized weeks after the 02/12/2008 slip and fall accident, at Providence Hospital in Southfield, MI NOT Livonia, MI. Laugh. Go ahead and laugh. Laugh, laugh, laugh. Newland Medical Center (Troy, MI) appears on defendant’s preliminary lay and expert witness list also. Plaintiff received treatment from Newland Medical in Novi, MI not Troy, MI. Newland Medical has several Michigan locations: Southfield, Bingham Farms, Novi and Pontiac. Troy, Michigan is not one of them. Laugh. Go ahead and laugh. Laugh, laugh, laugh.

Believe it or not, the Shiawassee Condominium Association (Southfield, MI) through its attorney, Jeanne Barron denied that it breached any of its duties and further denies that it was negligent but states it was guided by, and strictly observed all of its legal duties and obligations imposed by operation of law, the condominium bylaws and otherwise, in that all of the actions of its agents, servants, and/or employees were careful, proper, prudent and lawful. . . . it took proper action to administer and enforce its master deeds and bylaws but their insurance company released payment to the attorney for Edna Rogers; their insurance company released payment also to Attorney Ezra N. Goldman on behalf of Ms “X”. Moreover, a request for snow maintenance was requested 12/17/2007. The request was refused 12/24/2007 “these items are co-owner responsibility the association will take no action on them clear snow. Additional wording, None [snow] available at this time”. How about that “None [snow] available at this time”. The Shiawassee Condominium Association on 12/24/2007 “in writing” refused to honor its legal obligation stated in the condominium documents, Article V, Section 5 and the Michigan law statue MCL 559.153. (Shiawassee) on 12/24/2007 refused to honor its fiduciary responsibility that it [defendant] accepts in its Spring 2005 newsletter. While defendant (Shiawassee Condominium Association) is not surer of safety, it has a duty to exercise DUE CARE, Roberts v Stevens Enterprise, Inc. (1999) WL 334455020. Defendant (Shiawassee) on 12/24/2007 “in writing” refused to exercise DUE CARE. The Shiawassee Condo Association (Southfield, MI) though its attorney Jeffrey Vollmer of Wegner and Associates, P.C. (St. Clair Shores, MI) foreclosed on a unit without authorization from mortgagee, Chase Bank and named itself the mortgagee not Chase Bank. The Shiawassee Condo Association did not own the debt , was not the mortgagee and had no right to foreclose. She gave her credibility no worth – Jeanne Barron.

Wait! Wait! The best is yet to come. Barron, in her introduction 01/07/2010 Summary Disposition, page 2 , Case No. GC 09 1653 in the Michigan 46th District Court says (plaintiff) was not unfamiliar to defendant”. Truthfully, Defendant and Barron were not unfamiliar to plaintiff; all played part in a previous litigation, Case No. 2005-067809-NZ (Michigan Oakland County Circuit Court) of which plaintiff Ms. “X” prevailed. Plainiff Ms. ‘X” sued them and prevailed, payment was surrendered. She, Barron knew this. Barron perhaps did not know the Shiawassee Condominium Assocition Board of Director members during the GC 09 1653 litigation, should have. She, however knew Robert (Bob) Piech and Thomas Blanding. She was previously their representative attorney. She knew them from Case No. 2005-067809-NZ. She was familiar with them and of course, plaintiff Ms. “X”. She (Barron) is no doubt a bitter lawyer and NEVER accepted defeat. Unlike the attorney James Schmier, Ezra N. Goldman didn’t/wouldn’t side with defense attorneys Jeanne Barron and Timothy Egerer, didn’t/wouldn’t take money from the Shiawassee Condominium Association. Goldman, additionally was/is a seasoned attorney. The winner, in the end was Goldman NOT defense attorneys Timothy Egerer and Jeanne Barron. Goldman alone triumphed above (2) defense lawyers, Barron and Egerer and (2) big book size appeals. Barron and Egerer just didn’t know what in the hell they were doing, attempted to stop State Farm Insurance from paying up but failed.

The January 07, 2010 Summary Disposition, page 2 according to Jeanne Barron says “ plaintiff Ms. “X” alleges that, on September 18, 2008, she slipped and fell on accumulated ice on a sidewalk in the condominium complex. (See Plaintiff’s Complaint, paragraphs 17 and 18)” The summary disposition stated inaccurate information. Plaintiff, Ms. “X” did not slip and fall on accumulated ice on the sidewalk in the condominium complex on September 18, 2008; this is NOT STATED in the complaint, paragraph 17 and 18, Case No. GC 09 1653. How about that!!! LOL This attorney, Jeanne Barron brand names herself: talented, incredibly intelligent but unlike Gerald Thurswell and Judith Susskind not recognized by Best Lawyers in America or even another publication, Super Lawyers. Hummmmmmmmm A successful lawyer – thirty years – incredibly intelligent but Inept, an Imbecilic and Incompetent. She may be an active attorney in good standing with the Michigan State Bar Association but still a fat white woman lawyer that looks like a man, grotesque, heinous and a sociopath, should be evaluated by Dr. Scott T. Monson or Dr. Jeffrey Middledorf at 5700 E Eleven Mile Road (Warren, MI).

Defendant, Shiawassee Condominium Association (Southfield, MI) in its (Spring 2009) newsletter states owners must carry condo insurance; this is NOT stated in the bylaws. Defendant (Shiawassee) must carry insurance. This is stated in the bylaws, Article IV. Compliance of this bylaw ruling, Article IV is mandated by Michigan law statue MCL 559.153. Defendant shall (will) keep detailed books/records; this is stated in the bylaws, Article 1, Section 3. Compliance of this bylaw ruling Article 1, Section 3 is mandated by Michigan law statues MCL 559.153 and MCL 559.154 (1). Notification of all meetings shall (will) be forwarded to co-owners by mail. This is a bylaw ruling, Article 1 (f). Compliance of this bylaw ruling, Article 1 (f) is mandated by Michigan law statue MCL 559.153. “The [condominium association] bylaws do not supersede or overcome the law of Michigan”. Barron now inflamed says (all above) is harming her reputation. Laugh. Go ahead and laugh. Laugh. Laugh, Laugh. She said that via correspondence (02/20012) and forwarded it U.S. Mail – Certified, someone’s place of employment ‘UNAUTHORIZED’, amounts to harassment and violation of Michigan Law Statue MCL 750.411h (e). She, of course is DAMN MAD. Well, too bad Barron. Freedom of Speech is protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the Constitution of Michigan 1963, Section 5. You are not carte-blanche. Judge William J. Richards can’t help you, not now!!! Your reputation you say has been harmed, the Shiawassee Condominium Association (Southfield, MI), Robert (Bob) Piech and Thomas Blanding are the very ones responsible for this, your dilapidating reputation, should send them a thank you card, just a simple one that they can actually read, send it US Mail – Certified. You’re not a good quality lawyer, not even a mediocre one and your reputation well I guess drowning, must just wear the embarrassment.

People get burned playing with fire, even in litigation. Case [GC 09 1653] in the Michigan 46th District was declared frivolous she says but harming her reputation. LOL. The outcome, Case no. GC 09 1653 was declared frivolous only because Judge William J. Richards in the Michigan 46th District Court is dishonest and not fair. She influenced Judge Richards’ decisions, seems he was familiar with her. She also influenced plaintiff’s attorney, James G. Schmier. He Schmier worked for Barron not plaintiff, his client. She, additionally suppressed material facts and entered into fraud (silent fraud, intrinsic and extrinsic fraud). She was familiar with Ms. “X” plaintiff via Case no. 2005-067809-NZ in the Oakland County Circuit Court. Ms “X” plaintiff prevailed in that case involving same defendant as that in Case No. GC 09 1653 in the Michigan 46th District Court. Case No. 2005-067809-NZ dissolved out of court but not without a signed and sealed Release and Settlement agreement. The 2005-067809-NZ Release and Settlement agreement was signed by (3) attorneys; Jeanne Barron is one of them. She acquiesced to the Release and Settlment Agreement and signed it. That agreement barred her from expounding on facts and or non-facts that surfaced in case no. 2005-067809-N via communication of any kind. She could not transport facts and or non-facts from case no 2005-067809-NZ (Oakland County Circuit Court) into case no. GC 09 1653 in the Michigan 46th District Court. She did. Surprise! The ideas of a signed and sealed release and settlement agreement belongs to defense attorneys Jeanne Barron and Timothy Egerer.

Nonsense, of course not. She breached contract, a signed and sealed Release and Settlement agreement on file in the Michigan Oakland County Circuit Court. She could file a formal complaint but must challenge the Clean Hands Doctrine. She is now beyond safety of Judge William J. Richards who cannot help her. Her hands are not clean – Case no. 2005-067809-NZ case in the Michigan Oakland County Circuit Court is not hiding. Case no. GC 09 1653 Case in the Michigan 46th District Court is not hiding either. Case No. 2005-067809-NZ settled out of court with a signed and sealed Release and Settlement Agreement. She, Barron knew this BEFORE entering case no. GC 09 1653 in the Michigan 46th District Court, but just really needed that State Farm Insurance money, must have. She Barron may file a formal complaint but must prove that case no. 2005-067809-NZ (Michigan Oakland County Circuit Court) never existed. Must prove also that the court transcript writers lied.

Now, now Barron via the professional networking site tells us that she is senior attorney at Rafftery, Janeczek and Hoelscher (Farmington Hills, MI), a six-person injury insurance defense and litigation. She tells us that she has a Bachelor of Science degree (University of Michigan) specializing in Special Education and Journalism. She tells us also that she has a Juris Doctorate degree (Wayne State University), all that for a woman of vanity. She (Barron) touts the idea that she is incredibly intelligent. But well, based on her representation, Case No. GC 09 1653 in the Michigan 46th District Court, she’s not incredibly intelligent, not intelligent at all. This is quite visible in her representation, Case No. GC 09 1653 in the Michigan 46th District Court. The complaint is written on three counts. She, Barron acknowledges this before the tribune. “Your honor, you know this case is written on three counts”. Transcript Page 9 (line 1-2). Her 01/07/2010 summary disposition, however, does not address three counts. Laugh. Go ahead and laugh. Laugh, laugh, laugh.

The previous litigation, Case No. 2005-067809-NZ in the Oakland County Circuit Court dissolved with a signed and sealed confidentiality agreement prompted by the defense attorneys Barron and Egerer. Attorneys Barron and Egerer surrendered to Goldman but requested a Signed and Sealed Release and Settlement Agreement. There are possibly numerous copies. The original one however is on file at he Michigan Oakland County Circuit Court in Pontiac, Michigan. All parties and their attorneys signed the agreement. Barron represented three individuals employed by the Shiawassee Condo Association: Thomas Blanding, Robert (Bob) Piech and Mark Hawley signed that agreement as did Barron herself. She (Barron) could not transport information from Case No. 2005-067809-NZ, transfer and or enter it to another litigation. She did. Specific information stated “in writing” Case No. 2005-067809NZ was put into the 01/07/2010 Summary Disposition, Case No. GC 09 1653 (Michigan 46th District Court) from Jeanne Barron. The plaintiff, not Barron disclosed it to tribune. She was therefore forced to respond and did. She (Barron) stood before the court and spoke lightly with her hung head down “I didn’t bring it up because . . . . Laugh. Go ahead and laugh. Laugh, laugh, laugh. She said that “I didn’t bring it up because. . . . a successful lawyer of thirty years. . . . incredibly intelligent. Laugh. Go ahead and laugh. She, no doubt embarrasses the that Farmington Hills, Michigan law firm, Raftery, Janeczek and Hoelscher, the Michigan State Bar and the University of Michigan law school. Find the Best Lawyer site advertises this nut case, Jeanne Barron and another one Find a lawyer fast. She apparently registered herself on both sites. LawyersGarus.com recommends talented lawyers to consumers who are in need of legal assistance. Barron, somehow was entered into that database. Laugh. Just laugh.

The Michigan 46th District Court was never suppose to OPENLY be informed that there was a previous litigation involving same plaintiff, Ms “X” and same defendant, Shiawassee involving their maintenance staff of two, Robert (Bob) Piech and Thomas Blanding. Plaintiff’s attorney, James G. Schmier who was released as counsel just days before the hearing was to stop case from going that far but failed so Barron herself took on the task. She was there at the 01/11/2010 hearing, said she was just there for observation but forced herself before the court before Ms. “X” getting in the way. She even had comment. “My concern is that this is the third attorney Ms “X” has had” (Transcript Page 9, Line 20 – 21). Court was not in session to hear her concern. Court was not in session to hear her at all. The hearing was scheduled to hear Schmier’s petition to be released as counsel. She was indeed aggressive but very frightened because her summary disposition was already on file mentioning data of specifics that belonged ONLY in case no. 2005-067809-CZ in the Michigan Oakland County Circuit Court. The summary disposition she knew breached contract, a signed and sealed release and settlement agreement on file in the Michigan Oakland country circuit court. That agreement she knew exposed her signature and those whom she represented: Mark Hawley, Robert Piech and Thomas Blanding. Barron risked exposure of the 2005067809-NZ litigation and her paramount reputation upon accepting representation (Case No. GC 09 1653) in the Michigan 46th District Court and needed the attorney, James G. Schmier – do whatever it takes to get rid of it. Plaintiff, Ms. “X” paid him (Schmier) for representation as did the Shiawassee Condo Association but he, Schmier worked for defense attorneys Jeanne Barron and Jeffrey Vollmer not plaintiff, his client. He attempted to trash the case and plaintiff, his client but fell flat on his face. Once discovered, he (Schmier) petitioned the court to release him as counsel.

The attorney Schmier worked for the defense attorneys Jeanne Barron and Jeffrey Vollmer not plaintiff, his client. She, Barron also perpetrated fraud (actual fraud, silent fraud, intrinsic and extrinsic fraud and fraud on the court) and supressed material facts. She won the case GC 09 1653 but on crutches. Dr. Scott T. Monson was needed and would have been used. An independent evaluation by Dr. Scott T. Monson (orthopedic surgeon) was requested in the previous litigatin 2005-067809NZ but canceled because that case settled out of court before the scheduled evaluation. An independent evaluation was requested (3) times, case no. GC 09 1653 but (3) times missed. She Barron motioned (3) times -Compel plaintiff to appear at independent medical examination, Dr. Monson an orthopedic surgeon at the Middledorf Medical Group building addressed at 5700 E. Eleven Mile Road, Warren, MI 48091. Business name of Scott T. Monson, M.D. is listed by the state of Michigan, 230 Harper Ave, Harper Woods, MI 48225 not 5700 E Eleven Mile Road, Warren, MI 48091. The (3) requested independent evaluations (GC 09 1653) listed only an address, 5700 E Eleven Mile Road, not a business name. Something is wrong with that picture! Something is also wrong with our law system; those entwined in it (judges, lawyers, etc) may play games with their destines and that of others that oppress them. No matter, the lady, Ms “X” three times missed falling into that trap, the (3) requested independent evaluations.

Schmier on 01/11/2011 did not appear for hearing. He petitioned the court to release him as counsel but did not appear for hearing, “he wasn’t feeling well”. The individual who stood proxy for him, William Woolsey stated hearsay (Transcript Page 5, lines 5-9) not admissible under Michigan Rules of Evidence 802 but didn’t forget Dr. Monson, had to apprise scheduled evaluations via Dr. Monson and did. (Transcript Page 4, Line 23). Ms. “X” is not an individual of status but not mentally imbalanced. He, Dr. Monson or Dr. Middledorf likely would have suggested it. The stage was set for Dr. Monson. Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or other acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, scheme, plan, or system in doing an act, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident when the same is material, whether such other crimes, wrongs, or acts are contemporaneous with, or prior or subsequent to the conduct at issue in the case. Reading from the Michigan Rules of Evidence 404 (b). Barron had a scheme – definitely. Dr. Scott T. Monson was in it. Dr. Monson appeared on the preliminary lay and witness list as did Robert (Bob) Piech and Thomas Blanding. Both Dr. Scott T. Monson and Jeffrey Middledorf, D.O. are frequently used by Michigan defense attorneys representing insurance companies. Monson is is only an orthopedic surgeon but licensed (License No. 4301040712) to practice in Michigan, Middledorf is not; his Michigan state license cannot be verified. Middledorf practices at the Middledorf Medical Group addressed at 5700 E Eleven Mile Road (Warren, Michigan) and Medical Evaluation Specialists (MES) addressed at 35360 Nankin (Westland, Michigan) and these areas: psychiatry, Chiropractic and doctor of osteopathic. He, however, is NOT LICENSED to practice in none of them; Michigan State license cannot be verified, Michigan Dept. of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs. All amounts to medical fraud. Alike case number 2005-067809-NZ in the Michigan Oakland County Circuit Court and Case No. GC 09 1653 in the Michigan 46 District Court any type litigation defended by attorney Jeanne Barron likely will be linked to Dr. Scott T. Monson, an orthopedic surgeon for negative results. It’s wrong for the legal system to create a phychological defect if there is non. Barron was on a mission to do just that via Dr. Scott T. Monson, an orthopedic surgeon. The attorney James Schmier was aiding and forcing the judge, William Richards to allow it. This is a damn mad lawyer, convinced that she is so talented in the field of law, Jeanne Vallez Barron.

The Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission was contacted but just refused to do its job. No problem. The internet will suffice. His abject behavior, Attorney James Schmier has to be exposed. He disliked finding his name linked to a complaint board and blogs; this hastened him to file a lawsuit in the Michigan Oakland County Circuit Court, Case No. 2011-123947-CZ (12/2011), prayed for six digits and an apology. He is damn mad.Those complaint boards hurt his reputation, apparently, but the Michigan Oakland County Circuit Court refused to do anything about it. The Michigan Oakland County Circuit court rejected Schmier’s lawsuit, Case No. 2011-123947-CZ and trashed it (02/05/2013). He used the court to make some problems he made go away. He seriously thought the court could or would douce fires he let blaze “out of control”. His lies that couldn’t fly, his colossal blunders and negligence all fell into cyberspace and he is damn mad. He seriously thought the Michigan Oakland Count Court would do something about it. Alike Jeanne Barron, his hands are not clean. He could not approach court with unclean hands. His complaint 2011-123947-NZ did that, approached court with unclean hands and IMPROPER VENUE, stating incorrect county where action initiated. What a laugh. Well, we can see that his law acumen is certainly not the best. The Shiawassee Condominium Association (Southfield, MI) didn’t pay him enough and defense attorney, Jeanne Barron wasn’t a good enough quarterback.

Evidence of the habit of a person or of the routine practice of an organization, whether corroborated or not and regardless of the presence of eyewitness is relevant to prove that the conduct of the person or organization on a particular occasion was in conformity with the habitor routine practice (Reading from the Michigan Rules of evidence 404). He, attorney James G. Schmier made habit of stating inaccurate information. He submitted to the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission a bogus Retainer Fee Agreement, one he made up just for the occassion, response to a complaint. He said he sent (2) copies of his retainer fee agreement to client in the mail. Neither one was returned to him. Client never received either of the (2) retainer fee agreements. Conversation of a retainer fee agreement between Schmier and client NEVER surfaced either. He lied. He allowed entrance of a foist counter claim because he did not respond to documentation submitted to him from counter claim attorney did not attend hearing and NEVER made announcement of the counter claim. Client had no knowledge of the existing count claim until attending disposition a month later. The counter claim, additionally was announced by Jeanne Barron not Schmier. A counter claim must attach to an existing lawsuit immediately after filing, NOT four months later. That counter claim could have been blocked and could not ever again become an asserted action by same plaintiff, the Shiawassee Condominium Association. Only a seasoned attorney would have known this. Schmier we know was not a seasoned attorney but was at that point working for the Shiawassee Condominium Association. They had either paid him or promised him payment. Schmier was suppose to do nothing to aide or protect client Ms. “X” but just let things happen and did. He purposely didn’t respond to motion and or appear for hearing. It was all planned between Schmier, Barron and the counter claim attorney, Jeffrey Vollmer. Now, now Schmier on his billing said client was late for disposition. Schmier, though was not late for counter claim hearing, he just didn’t show up. Adding fuel to the fire, he filed a lawsuit in the Michigan Oakland County Circuit Court against ex-client doing just that “stating inaccurate information”. LOL Judge William J. Richards in the Michigan 46th District Court released him as counsel 01/10/2010 not 07/20/2010 as stated in his lawsuit, verifiable and public record information. Also, the lawsuit said defendant [ex-client] filed a complaint against him with the State Bar of Michigan. Defendant [ex-client] filed a complaint against him (Schmier) with the Attorney Grievance Commission (Detroit, MI) NOT the State Bar in Lansing, MI. Exhibits B, C and I of the complaint are all associated with the Attorney Grievance Commission NOT the State Bar of Michigan. Thrice, he exhibited proof that defendant filed complaint against him via the Attorney Grievance Commission, not the State Bar of Michigan and surrendered a reply letter he received Ruth Ann Stevens at the Attorney Grievance Commission. This is humilating, mortifying and embarrassing. Laugh. Go ahead and laugh. Laugh, laugh, laugh. The main component of his lawsuit is the State Bar of Michigan (Lansing, MI) in Ingham County but defendant [ex-client] never contacted the State Bar of Michigan to investigate him only the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission (Detroit, Michigan) in Wayne County. Numerous exhibits accompanying his complaint mentions the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission, not the Michigan State Bar. His complaint on file in the Michigan Oakland County Circuit Court is embarrassing, it’s just embarrassing and he’s a lawyer – James Schmier. That 01/07/2010 Summary Disposition on file in the Michigan 46th District Court is embarrassing, it’s just embarrassing and she’s a lawyer.

The attorney Ezra Goldman representing Case No. 2005-067809-NZ no doubt grew tired of the nefarious Jeanne Barron but stayed in the case consuming lots of laughs. That case actually amused him that much – The Shiawassee Condominium Association (Southfield, MI), Robert (Bob) Pieach, Thomas Blanding, Mark Hawley and their attorneys, mainly Jeanne Barron. Best piece of the pie, Goldman prevailed not the Jeanne Barron/Tim Egerer team. Case No. 2011-123947-CZ is likewise amusing. Ms. “X” challenged case and Attorney James Schmier without legal representation and prevailed. The lawsuit complaint document on file at the Michigan Oakland County Circuit Court is embarrassing, it’s just embarrassing as is he, James Schmier. Ms. “X” who NEVER entered law school, not a lawyer or paralegal challenged Attorney James Schmier and prevailed WITHOUT difficulty simply because Schmier is not a seasoned attorney. Schmier, the truth about Schmier, he’s surreptitious, a sociopath too but not professional, not an experienced lawyer, not an expert one either; advertisings are faux. He advertises false information. He just like Jeanne Barron has stacked too many lies, his website (www.schmierlaw.com), his response to the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission, (Case No. 0589-11) and last a formal complaint (Case No. 2011–123947-CZ) on file at the Michigan Oakland County Circuit Court proves this. Amidst all this, he has compromised and damaged a Birmingham, Michigan police officer’s reputation. He went that far influenced and controlled by a blood hound thirst woman lawyer seeking REVENGE but desperate for money. The Shiawassee Condominium Association (Southfield, MI) paid him and or promised him something that he wanted real bad and so he worked ONLY for defense attorneys Jeanne Barron and Jeffrey Vollmer. All, though, backfired at him, the Shiawassee Condominium Association, Barron and Vollmer. He, Schmier is now one damn mad lawyer and yes distraught.

The Michigan Court of Appeals Lugo v Ameritech (2001) established the Michigan Open and Obvious Premises Liability Law that that disallows premises liability lawsuits to knock on the door in Michigan. Even with the Open and Obvious Premises Liability Law weapon, defense attorney Jeanne Barron faced risks: (1). The Shiawassee Condominium Association BEFORE the 02/12/2012 slip and fall accident was issued not one but two warning letters via an attorney; these are verifiable. (2). The document refusing snow maintenance violates it bylaws and Michigan and Michigan law statue MCL 559.153, verifiable. (3). The Shiawassee Condominium Association breached its fiduciary responsibility that it accepted “in writing”. The Michigan Court of Appeals, Teadt v Lutheran Church (1999) would therefore have more power than the Michigan Court of Appeals Lugo v Ameritech (2001) (5). Speciality doctors, several, stated “in writing” that an existing medical condition was secondary not the primary cause of the Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) that came into existence immediately after the slip and fall accident. Too bad Schmier was/is a coward, non-experienced, didn’t know what he was doing and didn’t know what to do. Should have placed the lawsuit in the Michigan Oakland County Circuit Court as did his very own (Case No. 2011-123946-CZ). The lawsuit (GC 09 1653) was suing only the Shiawassee Condominium Association, should have sued both the Shiawassee Condominium Association and its managing agent, John P. Carroll Company (Farmington Hills, MI).

Case No. 2011-123947-CZ in the Michigan Oakland County Circuit Court embarrasses the attorney, James Schmier, the Michigan State Bar, likewise the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commisison and Thomas M. Cooley Law School; it proves that Schmier is a liar, does not know what in the hell he is doing and should not be practicing law. He’s just too incompetent and dolt, should be evaluated by Dr. Scott T. Monson. The Attorney Grievance Commission is located in Wayne County [Michigan] NOT Oakland County [Michigan] and the State Bar is located in Ingham County [Michigan] not Oakland County [Michigan]. He filed a complaint in the Michigan Oakland County Court mentioning the State Bar of Michigan in Lansing, MI (Ingham County). One of the exhibits accompaning his complaint was correspondece from Ruth Ann Stevens at the Attorney Grievance Commission (Detroit, Michigan) in Wayne County proving that defendant filed a complaint of ethics against him and the assigned file no. 0589-11 assigned by the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission; Schmier proved that defendant filed the complaint of ethics at the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission, Detroit, Michigan in Wayne County NOT the Michigan State Bar Commission, Lansing, Michigan in Ingham County. Both the State Bar of Michigan and the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission are outside of Oakland County. Laugh. Go ahead and laugh. Laugh, laugh, laugh. He seriously thought the court could or would force culpabilty upon defendant, Ms. “X”. His claim, case no. 2011-123947-CZ sad to say was frivious and abuses the law system. Also, he approached the court with unclean hands. Rottenstein Law Group LLP blog “What Are Unclean Hands”? explains it (unclean hands)” rather well. He, the attorney James G, Schmier initiated a defamation lawsuit but in it defames defendant and ex-client. Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or other acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, scheme, plan, or system in doing an act, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident when the same is material, whether such other crimes, wrongs, or acts are contemporaneous with, or prior or subsequent to the conduct at issue in the case. Reading from the Michigan Rules of Evidence 404 (b) (1). His lawsuit, case no. 2011-123947-CZ ended where it started – NOWHERE. He gave his creditility no worth – James Schmier. He’s a liar but not a good one. His lawsuit filed December 2011 in the Michigan Oakland County Circuit Court proved this. At the end of the day, he wasn’t worth the money the Shiawassee Condominium Association paid him and or Shiawassee just didn’t pay him enough. Judge Nancy Grant at the Michigan Oakland County Circuit Court perhaps was asked to help him but didn’t. She couldn’t or wouldn’t. Maybe. Answer to the lawsuit complaint estopped it from moving forward, but Grant allowed the sick – termillally ill complaint to live in her court “on life support” thirteen months total. Schmier now flaunts Criminal Denfense Attorneys of Michigan on his facebook page probably thinking THAT shines his shoes. Maybe he’s a member but not a crinial defense attorney, not an experienced attorney and not an expert one.

Judge William J. Richards in the Michigan 46th District Court bent over backwards for Jeanne Barron and counter claim lawyer Jeffrey Vollmer, but they outside his courtroom benefited nothing – REALLY. The condo unit attacked by Vollmer on behalf of the Shiawassee Condo Association was rightfully owned by Chase Bank not plaintiff, Ms. “X”. Chase Bank owned the loan debt. Chase Bank was first lien holder not the Shiawassee Condo Association.

The Shiawassee Condo Association (Southfield, MI) though its attorney Jeffrey Vollmer of Wegner and Associates, P.C. (St. Clair Shores, MI) foreclosed on a unit without authorization from mortgagee Chase Bank, but worse and rather embarrassing, Vollmer named the Shiawassee Condo Association the mortgagee; the Shiawassee Condo Association did not own the debt, was not the mortgagee, did not have a assignment of mortage according to Michigan Law Statue 600.3204 (3) and had no right to foreclose; all amounts to foreclosure fraud. Judge Rae Lee Chabot, in the Michigan Oakland County Circuit Court believe it or not allowed this. Crains Detroit, 09/15/2008, Volume 24, Issue 37, p8 focuses on the growing concern of mortgage fraud in Southeastern Michigan. It criticizes regulators for not protecting lenders, buyers and sellers.

Oakland County has become a hotspot for mortgage fraud, according to the previous Oakland County Clerk Ruth Johnson. Johnson said she wants it to stop. Her office [had] introduced a service that will allow homeowners to check if any unauthorized activity, such as quick claim deeds, mortgages and warranty deeds. She Judge Rae Lee Chabot apparently did not support fighting mortgage fraud in Oakland County as did Ruth Johnson. In fact, she allowed it. She accepted a falsified document and allowed mortgage fraud. She allowed an attorney’s infelicity. She did that, Judge Rae Lee Chabot. The Shiawassee Condo Association paid thousands for someone’s condo unit through the court system, much more than it was worth; falsified document (Sheriff Sale Deed) to get it, had possession, butttttttt less than six months. LOL The genuine mortgagee and First Lien Holder, Chase Bank foreclosed on them, the Shiawassee Condo association, because they had right. Michigan Law Statue MCL 559.208 (1) provides that a condominium assessment lien does not have priority over “sums unpaid on a first mortgage”. This is affirmed by the Michigan Court of Appeals, Oak Park v Cathey, et, al, Case No. 08-093850, Mich Ct. App, December 9, 2010 – The joke is on who??? Oakland County Clerk Bill Bullard in 2011 released a letter to the Attorney General Bill Schultz, said there is evidence to warrant an investigation into document fraud surrounding properties in Oakland Count that have been or about to be foreclosed. Hopefully, Judge Rae Lee Chabot, the Shiawassee Condominium Association (Southfield, MI) and their attorney Jeffrey Vollmer with Wegner and Associates are made aware of this. If a lender suspects fraud, they may file a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) with the FBI. Hopefully JP Morgan Bank did just that, but the Oakland County Prosecutors Office and the Oakland County Clerk/Register of Deeds work together “we want them to know when they come to Oakland County, they are going to be in big trouble” So, Judge Rae Lee Chabot, the Shiawassee Condominium Association (Southfield, MI) and attorney Jeffrey Vollmer associated with Wegner and Associates are all in big trouble. Detroit Police Officer Keith McCloud in 2011 was charged for his participation in a mortgage fraud scheme – The Schiawassee Condominium Association and Attorney Jeffrey Vollmer – not yet. Kim v JP Morgan Chase (2012) should worry the Shiawassee Condominium Association (Southfield, MI) and its attorney Jeffrey Vollmer but will certainly relieve those combating mortgage fraud in southeast Michigan.The foreclosure-by-advertisement statute, MCL 600.3204 (3), provides, “If the party foreclosing a mortgage by advertisement is not the original mortgagee, a record chain of title shall exist prior to the date of sale under section 3216 evidencing the assignment of the mortgage to the party foreclosing the mortgage.” MCL 600.3204(3). The Michigan Court of Appeals on 01/12/2012 , Case No. 302520- Kim v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, ruled that the party foreclosing a mortgage MUST comply with the MCL 600.3204’s requirement – no exception. Judge Rae Lee Chabot, the Shiawassee Condominium Association (Southfield, MI) and its attorney, Jeffrey Vollmer (Wegner & Associates) cannot slap MLS 600.3204 in its face with the Michigan State of Appeal Case Law Oak Park v Cathy (Case No. 08-093850) and Michigan State of Appeal Case Law Kim v JP Morgan Chase (Case No. 302520) holding hands;they are boss hog. Michigan Condominium owners, additionally need not be suckered by Attorney Robert M. Meisner of Meisner and Associates (Bingham Farms, MI) or his book, Condo Living: A Survival Guide to Buying Owning & Selling a Condominium. Meisner and Associates (Bingham Farms, MI) is not worth your trouble or money. Michigan law statues and applicable case laws concerning condominiums can be fought by any realestate lawyer not solely Meisner who names himself the Michigan Condominium King. Avoid this lawyer, Robert M. Meisner and law firm, Meisner and Associates.If assigned to Brian Harris, Harris is not a bright spot lawyer, a liar and will be telephoning Meisner if he is out of the office questing what to say to client. LOL

Michigan condominium associations and owners must adhere to its bylaws but important, extremely, “The [condominium association] bylaws do not supersede or overcome the law of Michigan”. Maintenance personnel in Michigan inspecting or administering maintenance in the areas of electrical, plumbing, heating and cooling must be licensed, must pass an exam to secure the license and must encircle the trade (s) or crafts (s) for which he or she is licensed (electrical, plumbing, heating or plumbing). Also, snow maintenance belongs to the condominium association NOT condominium owners; the monthly maintenance fee pays for this service. Condominium owners cannot withhold their required monthly maintenance fee, the condominium association however has a fiduciary responsibility to maintain the condominium property in good order, cannot refuse requested snow snow maintenance. While Condominium Associations are not surer of safety, it has a duty to exercise DUE CARE, Roberts v Stevens Enterprise, Inc. (1999) WL 334455020.

Truthfully, all could eat at the same table: Robert (Bob) Piech (Non-licensed maintenance worker and thug/Shiawassee Condo Assoc), Thomas Blanding (Non-licensed maintenance worker and thug/Shiawassee Condo Assoc.), Attorney Jeanne Vallez Barron (Raftery,Janeczek & Hoelscher) Attorney Jeffrey Vollmer (Wegner & Associates), Attorney James G. Schmier (Law Office of James G. Schmier), Dr. Scott T. Monson. Dr. Jeffrey Middledorf, Attorney Robert Meisner (Meiser & Associates), Judge William J. Richards in the Michigan 46th District Court and Judge Rae Lee Chabot in the Michigan Oakland County Circuit Court. Robert Ficano, Wayne County Executive and Detroit Ex-mayor, Kwame Kilpatrick and ex-City of Detroit Council Woman, Monica Conyers. All embarasses the Michigan State Bar: Judge William J. Richards, Judge Rae Lee Chabot, Attorney Jeanne Vallez Barron, Attorney Jeffrey Vollmer and Attorney James G. Schmier also Kwame Kilpatrick and Robert Ficano who are also lawyers. Judge William J. Richards is in violation of the canons 1 and 2 of the Michigan Code of Judicial Conduct. She, Chabot allowed violation of Michigan law statue MCL 600.3204 (3). Judge William J. Richards allows courtroom corruption and knew what he was doing. Judge Chabot, well she just let things happen costing the State of Michigan excessive time and money to combat graft, violation of law statue MCL 6003204 (3) and mortgage fraud Judge Nanci Grant it seems would not yield to corrupting the Michigan law system. Maybe.