Skip to content

James G. Schmier: A Michigan Law License Mistake

February 18, 2013

Loser SchmierWhile representing Case No. GC 09 1653 in the Michigan 46th District Court, he James G. Schmier (P70825) did nothing. He didn’t know what he was doing but didn’t know what to do. He worked for the defense attorneys Jeanne Barron and Jeffrey Vollmer NOT plaintiff his client. He allowed an attached counter claim that should have been prevented. A counter claim must attach to the original lawsuit immediately after filing. He, Schmier filed a lawsuit for plaintiff and ex-client 04/2009 in the Michigan 46th District Court. A counter claim attached to it September 2009, months late. This refutes his advertising. He is not an experienced lawyer “will fight for you”. He, additionally could not account for funds used/unused. After nine months of doing absolutely nothing, he petitioned the court to withdraw and did. He did not respond to motion and did not appear for hearing; this is notated on transcript. He confessed this to the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission but the transcript proved his guilt.

He confessed inept but put on top of it a really big lie. He said he entered the wrong date into his computer. “I admit I failed to attend meeting. . . . I made a mistake in entering it in my computer calendar. The hearing was 09/30/2009. I mistakenly entered in my computer calendar for 10/30/2009”. Hummmmm Really!!! He did this too, he presented the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission a bogus retainer fee agreement. He did. Yes he did. According to Schmier, he sent (2) copies of the retainer fee to client via US Mail but neither was returned to him. Laugh. Go ahead and laugh. Laugh, laugh, laugh.

Hummmm stupid, pure stupidity. The client NEVER received either of the two retainer fee agreements because he (Schmier) NEVER prepared/submitted them. He LIED. The subject matter concerning a retainer fee agreement between Schmier and client NEVER ever surfaced. After nine months of doing nothing, he (Schmier) said “this case is hard. He said that this case is hard but also exposed his NEGLECT and Civil Conspiracy. Client accompanied by a Birmingham, Michigan police officer retrieved all case files from Schmier at his Birmingham, MI office (2222 Attard St.) December 2009. This was before the January 2010 court date to hear argument to release him as counsel.

He (Schmier) NEVER had conversations with the Birmingham, MI police officer concerning escorted client. He said he did. He LIED. The Birmingham, MI police officer denies his allegation. “I did not tell him that and I did not write that in my police report. I was leaving right behind you [ex-client]. He, therefore, has compromised and damaged a Birmingham, Michigan police officer’s reputation and ex-client. He went that far for Attorney Jeanne V. Barron, Raftery, Janeczek & Hoelscher/Farmington Hills, MI (white female woman lawyer looks like a man). He went that far for Attorney Jeffrey L. Vollmer (Wegner & Associates, P.C/Saint Clair Shores, MI). They surrendered him something and or promised him something (Jeanne Barron and Jeffrey Vollmer, something he wanted it – real bad. Evidence of the habit of a person or of the routine practice of an organization, whether corroborated or not and regardless of the presence of eyewitness is relevant to prove that the conduct of the person or organization on a particular occassion was in conformity with the habitor routine practice (Reading from the Michigan Rules of evidence 404). He, attorney James G. Schmier made habit of stating inaccurate information.

He (Schmier) is a No. 1 Loser and Master Liar. He lies all over the map. How he ever attained a Michigan Law License is yet a mystery. He, no doubt embarasses the Michigan State Bar. Oh! By the way, he didn’t show up in court to represent himself (01/11/2010). He petitioned the court to withdraw (Case No. GC 09 1653) but did not/could not show his face in court. He wasn’t feeling well. Hummmm, Really!!!. Do not invest in this attorney James G. Schmier. Do not invest in his law firm, Schmier Law, PLLC (Birmingham, MI) and or other businesses associated with him: 1). Dui-Detroit (Birmingham, MI) and 2). J. Schmier Productions, Ltd (Birmingham, MI). WARNING!!! RED FLAG!!!!! His advertisements are ALL FALSE, He is not an experienced lawyer. He’s not an expert in criminal law, DUI, Divorce, etc. He is not an expert at anything.

The Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission was/is non-helpful, blogs and complaint boards are. The attorney, James G. Schmier filed a lawsuit in the Oakland County Circuit Court, Case No. 2011-123947-CZ. Those complaint boards hurt his reputation, APPARENTLY. Case was disposed. Alike Jeanne Barron, his hands are not clean. He could not approach the court with unclean hands. His lawsuit complaint approached the court with unclean hands and improper venue. LOL

The lawsuit complaint, Case No. 2011-123947-CZ stated more non-truths than actual truths. Judge William J. Richards in the Michigan 46th District Court released him as counsel (Case No. GC 09 1653) 01/11/2010 NOT 07/20/2010 as stated in the 2011-123947-C complaint. Document signed by Judge William J. Richards on 01/11/2010 proves this. The Michigan 46th District Court Clerk Wanda Frost on 12/22/2009 forwarded to all parties a Notice of Hearing that was scheduled 01/11/2010 and forwarded one to Attorney James Schmier. Judge William J. Richards on 01/11/2010 granted the petition, counsel (James G. Schmier) to withdraw. The complaint, 2011-123947-CZ said also that defendant filed a complaint against him with the State Bar of Michigan. He lied. Defendant filed a complaint against him (Schmier) with the Attorney Grievance Commission (Detroit, MI) NOT the State Bar (Lansing, MI). Proof of this appeares in the lawsuit complaint, 2011-123947-CZ – correspondence signed by Ruthann Stevens who is associated with the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission. LOL Ruthann Stevens, Esq. at the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commissison investigated the complaint against Schmier, not the Michigan State Bar. Ruthann Stevens at the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission in Detroit, MI (Wayne County) made no move to reprimand him but also did not free him of doing wrong. The Attorney Grievance Commission alike lawyers and judges does not play fair ball. Many Michiganders know this – apparently. Ruthann Stevens, Esq at the Michigan Attorney Grievance seemingly has fallen off track somewhere;letter penned by Elizabeth A. Weaver proves this. Correspondence (attached exhibit – Complaint No. 2011-123947-CZ) submitted by Ruthann Stevens does not free him (Schmier) of doing anything wrong; he thinks otherwise and publicized it in his complaint. He (Schmier) apparently has a comprehension problem; this is rather serious for adults, even more serious for adults practicing law. It’s sad that Schmier did not fully comprehend just what Ruthann Stevens stated in that correspondence, but sadder and rather embarrassing that he filed that complaint and attached to it that correspondence penned by Stevens. He filed a formal lawsuit complaint in the Oakland County Circuit court with exhibits, one of them was correspondence from Ruthann Stevens at the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission (Detroit, MI) but the Attorney Grievance Commission is located is in Wayne County [Michigan] NOT Oakland County [Michigan]. Laugh. Go ahead and laugh. Laugh, laugh, laugh. His claim, case no. 2011-123947-CZ was friv0lous and abuses the law system. Also, he approached the court with unclean hands. He, the attorney James G, Schmier initiated a defamation lawsuit but in it defames his defendant, an ex-client. LOL Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or other acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, scheme, plan, or system in doing an act, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident when the same is material, whether such other crimes, wrongs, or acts are contemporaneous with, or prior or subsequent to the conduct at issue in the case (Reading from the Michigan Rules of Evidence 404 (b) (1). Following that leader Jeanne Vallez Barron leads nowhere.

The Thumbtack site adverises this attorney, James G. Schmer “hire James Schmier if you need an agressive criminal defense lawyer who is also experienced in drunk driving and family law. LOL


One Comment

    Funny, the attorney, James Schmier files a defamation claim against his ex-client and in it defames the ex-client.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: